<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: puff puff give</title>
	<atom:link href="http://giantmonster.com/2006/05/24/puff-puff-give/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://giantmonster.com/2006/05/24/puff-puff-give/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 06:31:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: giantmonster</title>
		<link>http://giantmonster.com/2006/05/24/puff-puff-give/#comment-24595</link>
		<dc:creator>giantmonster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://giantmonster.com/2006/05/24/puff-puff-give/#comment-24595</guid>
		<description>thanks tony! i have read those recent (2008) news stories as well. my guess is you are referring to one or more of the studies mentioned in these news articles:
&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Health/CancerPreventionAndTreatment/wireStory?id=4207595" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;Cannabis Bigger Cancer Risk Than Cigarettes: Study&lt;/a&gt; - 79 people studied
&lt;a href="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-01/jhmi-mwa012408.php" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;Marijuana withdrawal as bad as withdrawal from cigarettes&lt;/a&gt; - 12 people studied
&lt;a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/healthNews/idUSTON07855720080130" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;Signs of emphysema may develop early in pot smokers&lt;/a&gt; - 10 people studied

while i know that inhaling any smoke is bad, i would not point to those stories as evidence that cannabis is more carcinogenic by any means. these news stories which now state that smoking pot is bad/worse than cigarettes tend to cite these three studies which covered only 100 people altogether (79 people being the highest). that is a very small amount to test from. there was also no comparative group or control group in those studies to measure the results with (which makes the results somewhat biased). the results from the studies do make for good headlines!

conversely, the &lt;a href="http://www.webmd.com/content/article/122/114805.htm" target=_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;Web MD article&lt;/a&gt; of 2006 linked in the above post (and in this &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/25/AR2006052501729_pf.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow"&gt;washington post article&lt;/a&gt;) references a study finding no link to smoking pot and lung cancer which used over 2,200 people; 1,200 people with lung cancer and 1,041 people without lung cancer. it was the largest case-control study ever done regarding marijuana use. its findings would be much more accurate. 

it would be great to compare the data between these two differing studies.

in any case, if you are going to smoke marijuana, avoid smoke as much as possible and buy a vaporizer. 

anyway - thanks for the comment tony!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks tony! i have read those recent (2008) news stories as well. my guess is you are referring to one or more of the studies mentioned in these news articles:<br />
<a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Health/CancerPreventionAndTreatment/wireStory?id=4207595" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Cannabis Bigger Cancer Risk Than Cigarettes: Study</a> - 79 people studied<br />
<a href="http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2008-01/jhmi-mwa012408.php" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Marijuana withdrawal as bad as withdrawal from cigarettes</a> - 12 people studied<br />
<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/healthNews/idUSTON07855720080130" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">Signs of emphysema may develop early in pot smokers</a> - 10 people studied</p>
<p>while i know that inhaling any smoke is bad, i would not point to those stories as evidence that cannabis is more carcinogenic by any means. these news stories which now state that smoking pot is bad/worse than cigarettes tend to cite these three studies which covered only 100 people altogether (79 people being the highest). that is a very small amount to test from. there was also no comparative group or control group in those studies to measure the results with (which makes the results somewhat biased). the results from the studies do make for good headlines!</p>
<p>conversely, the <a href="http://www.webmd.com/content/article/122/114805.htm" target=_blank" rel="nofollow">Web MD article</a> of 2006 linked in the above post (and in this <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/25/AR2006052501729_pf.html" target="_blank" rel="nofollow">washington post article</a>) references a study finding no link to smoking pot and lung cancer which used over 2,200 people; 1,200 people with lung cancer and 1,041 people without lung cancer. it was the largest case-control study ever done regarding marijuana use. its findings would be much more accurate. </p>
<p>it would be great to compare the data between these two differing studies.</p>
<p>in any case, if you are going to smoke marijuana, avoid smoke as much as possible and buy a vaporizer. </p>
<p>anyway - thanks for the comment tony!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tony</title>
		<link>http://giantmonster.com/2006/05/24/puff-puff-give/#comment-24590</link>
		<dc:creator>Tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 11:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://giantmonster.com/2006/05/24/puff-puff-give/#comment-24590</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, the latest evidence shows that pot is far more carcinogenic (cancer-causing) than tobacco. Fairly obvious if you ask me. With 9 out of 10 cases of lung cancer occuring in smokers, did you think you'd be magically immune?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, the latest evidence shows that pot is far more carcinogenic (cancer-causing) than tobacco. Fairly obvious if you ask me. With 9 out of 10 cases of lung cancer occuring in smokers, did you think you&#8217;d be magically immune?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
